Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Hays v. Sebelius, No. 08-5508

By FindLaw Staff on December 22, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action by a Medicare Part B beneficiary challenging a decision by a regional Medicare contractor to reimburse for a particular drug only up to the price of its least costly alternative, summary judgment for plaintiff is affirmed where the Medicare Act unambiguously foreclosed that determination and required instead that Medicare pay for covered items or services at a statutorily prescribed rate.

Read Hays v. Sebelius, No. 08-5508

Appellate Information

Argued November 5, 2009

Decided December 22, 2009


Opinion by Judge Tatel


For Appellants:

Samantha L. Chaifetz, Mark B. Stern and Christopher C. Fonzone, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC

For Appellee:

Stuart M. Gerson and Robert E. Wanerman, Epstein Becker & Green LLP, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard