Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Miller v. Hersman, No. 08-5494

By FindLaw Staff on February 05, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a sex and age discrimination action, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where: 1) defendant failed to carry its burden to show that plaintiff did not timely contact an EEO counselor and thus did not exhaust his administrative remedies; and 2) plaintiff did not fail to respond to defendant's exhaustion argument.

Read Miller v. Hersman, No. 08-5494

Appellate Information

Argued November 17, 2009

Decided February 5, 2010


Opinion by Judge Henderson


For Appellant:

David A. Young and Carl S. Nadler, Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington, DC

For Appellee:

Brian P. Hudak and R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant United States Attorneys, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard