Mills v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 08-7127
In an action to enjoin further implementation of a police checkpoint program in Defendant city, the denial of a preliminary injunction is reversed, where the checkpoint did not meet the Fourth Amendment's requirement of individualized suspicion.
Read Mills v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 08-7127
Argued May 8, 2009
Decided July 10, 2009
Opinion by Judge Sentelle
Mara E. Verheyden-Hilliard, Washington, DC
Todd S. Kim, Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Or contact an attorney near you: