Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Mitchell v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 05-5420

By FindLaw Staff on November 20, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a prisoner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, the application is denied where, although plaintiff had only two "strikes" under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and thus the PLRA did not automatically bar him from proceeding IFP, the court denied the application as a discretionary matter because of plaintiff's pattern of abusive litigation in the past and his failure to qualify for IFP status under the imminent danger exception.

Read Mitchell v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 05-5420

Appellate Information

Argued October 5, 2009

Decided November 20, 2009


Opinion by Judge Tatel


For Appellant:

Sara Kaiser, Steven H. Goldblatt, Cecily Baskir and Charlotte Garden, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC

For Appellee:

Harry B. Roback, R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard