Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Ord v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 08-7094

By FindLaw Staff on December 07, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action claiming that the District of Columbia lacked probable cause to secure an arrest warrant against plaintiff for allegedly violating firearms laws, dismissal of the complaint for lack of standing is reversed where the warrant for plaintiff's arrest revealed that the district had already targeted him for prosecution, and its concession signaled that it expected to prosecute him in the future.

Read Ord v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 08-7094

Appellate Information

Argued September 18, 2009

Decided December 4, 2009


Opinion by Judge Tatel

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Brown


For Appellant:

Matthew A. LeFande, Washington, DC

For Appellee:

Todd S. Kim, Peter J. Nickles, Donna M. Murasky, Office of the Solicitor General of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard