Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Anderson-Tully Co. v. McDaniel, No. 08-3469

By FindLaw Staff on July 07, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action seeking to quiet title and enjoin defendant from attempting to claim disputed waters for public use, district court judgment dismissing the suit is affirmed where: 1) the court erred in concluding the case is not ripe for adjudication as there is a live controversy; and 2) the court reached the proper result and the case must be dismissed as the suit against the Arkansas Attorney General in his official capacity is bared by the Eleventh Amendment and the Ex Parte Young exception does not apply. 

Read Anderson-Tully Co. v. McDaniel, No. 08-3469

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Submitted: June 9, 2009
Filed: July 7, 2009

Before BYE, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by BYE, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard