Content For YouCivil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Casey v. FDIC, No. 09-1096
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="600" height="300"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
In an action against mortgage lenders alleging that the lenders had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by charging a fee for preparation of loan documents by nonlawyers, judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) all claims in a case to which the FDIC was a party had "arising under" federal subject matter jurisdiction; and 2) the document preparation fees at issue constituted loan-related fees, including without limitation, initial charges, as enumerated in 12 C.F.R. section 560.2(b)(5).
Read Casey v. FDIC, No. 09-1096
Appellate Information
Submitted: September 24, 2009
Filed: October 20, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Murphy
