Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Cintas Corp. v. NLRB, No. 09-1344

By FindLaw Staff on December 15, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a petition for review of the NLRB's order finding that petitioner had interfered with its employees' exercise of rights protected under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and imposing remedial measures, the petition is denied where: 1) while an employer may assert that an employee's conduct is unprotected under the NLRA because it had an unlawful objective, the acts or objective of the national union cannot be imputed to an individual employee; and 2) petitioner's repudiation was insufficient to cure its unlawful confiscation of union flyers.

Read Cintas Corp. v. NLRB, No. 09-1344

Appellate Information

Submitted: September 21, 2009

Filed: December 15, 2009


Opinion by Judge Murphy

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard