Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Kebede v. Hilton, No. 08-3326

By FindLaw Staff on September 04, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a civil case alleging alienation of affection, district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence that the defendant had affairs with other men, where there was no evidence she had alienated the other men's affections or was aware that their affections had been alienated, as this is an intentional tort and such evidence would only have shown defendant's propensity for affairs in violation of Rule 404(a). 

Read Kebede v. Hilton, No. 08-3326

Appellate Information

Submitted: June 10, 2009

Filed: September 4, 2009


Opinion by Smith, Circuit Judge

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard