Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Keiser v. US, No. 07-3878

By FindLaw Staff on August 27, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Sentence and conviction of defendant on bank fraud related charges is affirmed where: 1) district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to continue sentencing as defendant's attorney had sufficient time to prepare for sentencing and as reflected by his conduct; 2) district court's failure to inform defendant of right to standby counsel did not negate the validity of defendant's waiver of right to counsel, as defendant had no absolute right to such; 3) district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert testimony regarding fiduciary duties of commodities brokers, as any unfair prejudice to defendant was slight and insufficient to outweigh its probative value ; and 4) district court did not err in applying the sentencing enhancements under the Guidelines.   

Read Keiser v. US, No. 07-3878

Appellate Information

Submitted: June 10, 2009

Filed: August 27, 2009


Opinion by Smith, Circuit Judge

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard