Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Losh v. Fabian, No. 09-1394

By FindLaw Staff on January 05, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In habeas corpus proceedings following the Minnesota Supreme Court's affirmation of the revocation of petitioner's probation and the execution of her stayed 120 month sentence for aiding and abetting kidnapping, denial of the petition is affirmed where: 1) the state supreme court's conclusion that a Fields appeal was not a form of direct review under Minnesota law was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law; and 2) Jimenez v. Quarterman, 129 S. Ct. 681 (2009), was not clearly established federal law at the time of the state supreme court's decision.

Read Losh v. Fabian, No. 09-1394

Appellate Information

Submitted: November 18, 2009

Filed: January 4, 2010


Opinion by Judge Murphy

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard