Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Matter Regarding Indian Tribal Court Jurisdiction, and Civil Rights Matter

By FindLaw Staff on July 07, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Attorney's Process & Investigation Servs., Inc. v. Sac & Fox Tribe of the Miss. in Iowa, No. 09-2605, involved an action seeking a declaratory judgment that an Indian tribal court lacked jurisdiction and an order compelling arbitration.  The court of appeals affirmed summary judgment for defendant in part on the ground that the tribal courts could exercise adjudicatory jurisdiction over the tribe's claims against plaintiff for trespass to land, trespass to chattels, and conversion of tribal trade secrets.  However, the court reversed in part, holding that the tribal court did not have jurisdiction under the second Montana exception over the tribe's claim for conversion of tribal funds.

Orr v. Larkins, No. 08-3857, concerned an action claiming that prison officials violated plaintiff's rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and under the Eighth Amendment, by keeping him in administrative segregation for about nine months following his third "dirty" urine test.  The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal of the complaint, on the ground that a demotion to administrative segregation, even without cause,
was not itself an atypical and significant hardship.

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard