Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an action claiming that defendant-insurer used inflated lapse rates to purposefully underprice its LTC insurance products and gain market share, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) plaintiffs failed to show that their LTC insurance policies contained a fraudulent representation; 2) plaintiffs' claim for bad faith denial of benefits failed because plaintiffs were not alleging a denial of benefits; and 3) the additional discovery sought by plaintiffs was not relevant to the district court's decision.
Read Rakes v. Life Investors Ins. Co., No. 08-2626
Appellate Information
Submitted: March 12, 2009
Filed: September 18, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Wollman
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: