Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Anderson, No. 08-3402

By FindLaw Staff on July 06, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Conviction and sentence for wire fraud, making false statements, and failure to appear is affirmed where: 1) the evidence was sufficient to support defendant's convictions for wire fraud and failure to appear; 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for new counsel, and made an adequate inquiry into defendant's dissatisfaction with his attorney; 3) the use of the 2007 Guidelines Manual did not create an ex post facto violation; and 4) the court's denial of defendant's request for a downward departure was unreviewable.    

Read US v. Anderson, No. 08-3402

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota.
Submitted: June 10, 2009
Filed: July 6, 2009

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard