Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Arciniega, No. 08-3143

By FindLaw Staff on June 24, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Conviction for drug crimes is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to authorize a subpoena duces tecum for previous traffic citations issued by police officer, as subjective intention plays no role in Fourth Amendment analysis and the burden of producing the records outweighed the possible relevance for documents; 2) the court did not err in rejecting defendant's challenge to the constitutionality of the windshield obstruction statute; and 3) the court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence as the record supports the conclusion that defendant voluntarily consented to the search. 

Read US v. Arciniega, No. 08-3143

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Submitted: March 10, 2009
Filed: June 24, 2009

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard