Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Beane, No. 08-3769

By FindLaw Staff on October 20, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's drug distribution sentence is affirmed where: 1) it was not error for the district court to consider whether a particular sentence would be reversed on appeal; and 2) because defendant was sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. section 4B1.1, his offense level was determined by the statutory maximum penalty for the offense of conviction, not by section 2D1.1 and its crack-powder ratio.

Read US v. Beane, No. 08-3769

Appellate Information

Submitted: June 11, 2009

Filed: October 20, 2009


Opinion by Judge Colloton

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard