Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Boaz, No. 09-2591

By FindLaw Staff on March 15, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In US v. Boaz, No. 09-2591, the court of appeals dealt with a defendant's firearm possession sentence and a finding that defendant was subject to the the Armed Career Criminal Act.

The circuit court had previously remanded the case, as it explained, "...because the parties had erroneously stated to the district court that the record contained certain identifying information as to one of the prior violent felony convictions, a 1974 Yavapai County, Arizona conviction for brandishing a weapon other than in self-defense."  Defendant, however, claimed that he wasn't "...the same person who was named in the 1974 Arizona conviction."

On remand, the district court received evidence and reapplied the same 190-month sentence. The circuit court here affirmed, holding that the identical names, coupled with subsequent records containing ample identification evidence listing not only defendant's name, but also identifying characteristics such as height, weight, age, and tattoos, was sufficient to support the district court's finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant was the same person who was the subject of a prior state conviction.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard