Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Bordeaux, No. 08-2280

By FindLaw Staff on July 07, 2009 3:17 PM

Conviction for assault and discharging a firearm during a crime of violence is affirmed where: 1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for a mistrial as even assuming arguendo that the court's comment during voir dire was potentially prejudicial, there was no evidence that the trial's overall fairness was impacted by the court's passing comment; 2) the evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for assault with a deadly weapon and knowingly discharging a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence; 3) the court carefully reviewed the evidence concerning the victims' prior bad acts, and the court did not err in excluding some of the incidents as cumulative; and 4) the court did not err in refusing to allow defendant to impeach a witness with a prior statement as the statement was on a collateral matter and was not admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 613(b). 

Read US v. Bordeaux, No. 08-2280

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the  District of South Dakota
Submitted: February 11, 2009
Filed: July 7, 2009

Before BYE, JOHN R. GIBSON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard