Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Cote, No. 08-3022

By FindLaw Staff on June 23, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Conviction for drug crimes and firearms possession is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence as the Fourth Amendment does not require the issuing judge to record sworn supplementary oral testimony, and thus the judge's failure to do so did not violate the Fourth Amendment or prevent meaningful review of the probable cause finding; and 2) the failure to record supplementary oral testimony did not constitute a violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(d)(2)(c), as the rule is inapplicable since this was a state court warrant, sought and executed by state officers. 

Read US v. Cote, No. 08-3022

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Submitted: May 14, 2009
Filed: June 23, 2009

Before RILEY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by RILEY, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard