Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Feemster, No. 06-2059

By FindLaw Staff on July 13, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where: 1) the district court provided substantial insight into the reasons for its sentencing decision, and thus did not fail to adequately explain its chosen sentence; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant as its justification for imposing the sentence rested on precisely the kind of defendant-specific determinations that are within the special competence of the sentencing courts.    

Read US v. Feemster, No. 06-2059

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Submitted: April 17, 2009
Filed: May 14, 2009

Judges
Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, BEAM, MURPHY, BYE, RILEY, MELLOY, SMITH, COLLOTON, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Concurring Opinions by RILEY and COLLOTON.
Dissenting Opinion by BEAM.

 

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard