Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Hamilton, No. 08-3233

By FindLaw Staff on January 13, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's child pornography conviction is affirmed where: 1) the officers who performed a warrantless search of defendant's home had reasonable suspicion to do so; and 2) there was no justification for applying the exclusionary rule based on a defect in a later search warrant, because the detective who prepared the warrant merely made a clerical error.

Read US v. Hamilton, No. 08-3233

Appellate Information

Submitted: April 17, 2009

Filed: January 13, 2010


Opinion by Judge Hansen

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard