US v. Hamilton, No. 08-3233
Defendant's child pornography conviction is affirmed where: 1) the officers who performed a warrantless search of defendant's home had reasonable suspicion to do so; and 2) there was no justification for applying the exclusionary rule based on a defect in a later search warrant, because the detective who prepared the warrant merely made a clerical error.
Read US v. Hamilton, No. 08-3233
Submitted: April 17, 2009
Filed: January 13, 2010
Opinion by Judge Hansen
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Or contact an attorney near you: