US v. Hamilton, No. 08-3233

Defendant's child pornography conviction is affirmed where: 1) the officers who performed a warrantless search of defendant's home had reasonable suspicion to do so; and 2) there was no justification for applying the exclusionary rule based on a defect in a later search warrant, because the detective who prepared the warrant merely made a clerical error.

Read US v. Hamilton, No. 08-3233

Appellate Information

Submitted: April 17, 2009

Filed: January 13, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Hansen