Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Ingram, No. 09-2121

By FindLaw Staff on February 10, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's drug possession conviction and sentence are affirmed where: 1) a pat-down search of defendant was reasonable due to the officer's concern for his safety; 2) defendant was not prejudiced by the district court's preliminary instruction that the jury may hear evidence that defendant had previously been convicted of a prior drug offense; and 3) 18 U.S.C. section 841 did not require that the government prove a defendant was convicted under a particular statutory provision, but only required proof of a prior felony drug offense.

Read US v. Ingram, No. 09-2121

Appellate Information

Submitted: September 23, 2009

Filed: February 10, 2010


Opinion by Judge Bright

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard