Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Moore, No. 08-2812

By FindLaw Staff on September 11, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's identity theft sentence is affirmed where: 1) the district court could only consider the value of defendant's substantial assistance in reducing his mandatory two-year sentence for aggravated identity theft based on the government's 18 U.S.C. section 3553(e) motion; and 2) defendant did not file a motion for a departure nor request a departure orally at the sentencing hearing.

Read US v. Moore, No. 08-2812

Appellate Information

Submitted: May 15, 2009

Filed: September 11, 2009


Per Curiam

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard