Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Sandstrom, No. 08-3161

By FindLaw Staff on January 31, 2010 6:10 PM

Defendants' murder and firearm use convictions are affirmed where 1) it was the government's evidence -- not any perceived conflict between defendants' defense theories -- that was the basis for the jury's verdicts, and thus the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to sever defendants' trials; 2) given the multiple purposes of defendants' separate acts at different times and locations, the district court did not err in refusing to dismiss certain counts of the indictment; and 3) 18 U.S.C. section 245 was a valid exercise of Congress's power under the Thirteenth Amendment.

Read US v. Sandstrom, No. 08-3161

Appellate Information

Submitted: September 22, 2009

Filed: January 29, 2010


Opinion by Judge Smith

Copied to clipboard