Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Stymiest, No. 08-3320

By FindLaw Staff on September 22, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury in Indian country is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly submitted the issue of defendant's Indian status to the jury as an element of 18 U.S.C. section 1153(a); 2) the district court's instructions on defendant's Indian status were not an abuse of discretion; 3) sufficient evidence supported the jury's finding that defendant was an Indian for purposes of the section 1153(a) offense; 4) the instructions as a whole did not constructively amend the indictment by permitting the jury to convict defendant of an uncharged offense; and 5) the district court properly enhanced defendant's sentence as a career offender.

Read US v. Stymiest, No. 08-3320

Appellate Information

Submitted: June 11, 2009

Filed: September 22, 2009


Opinion by Judge Loken

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard