Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Tolliver, No. 08-3229

By FindLaw Staff on July 07, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in concluding defendant was not eligible for modification of his crack sentence under 18 U.S.C. sec. 3582(c) as his applicable Guidelines range was his career offender range and that range had not been lowered by Amendment 706; and 2) the court did not err in denying defendant's motion for a sentence reduction as his sentence was explicitly based on a stipulation between the parties and not on a sentencing range that had subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission. 

Read US v. Tolliver, No. 08-3229

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Submitted: June 10, 2009
Filed: July 7, 2009

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard