Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Tonks, No. 08-3821

By FindLaw Staff on July 29, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Sentence for wire fraud is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in denying defendant's request for an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction as his comments showed he expressly and unequivocally denied his factual guilt; and 2) the court followed proper procedure and applied the relevant factors in determining whether the sentence in this case should be consecutive to two other sentences, and its decision to impose a consecutive sentence was reasonable.   

Read US v. Tonks, No. 08-3821

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
Submitted: June 12, 2009
Filed: July 29, 2009

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard