Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's conspiracy to manufacture marijuana conviction is affirmed where: 1) there was no two-part interrogation for Miranda purposes because, prior to the recitation of the Miranda warnings, the officers made no deliberate or calculated effort to elicit a confession from defendant, and defendant made no incriminating statements; 2) following a "knock and talk," defendant told the detectives that he would prefer to talk inside his apartment, and he voluntarily consented to the detectives' entrance into the apartment; and 3) there was sufficient evidence to convict defendant of the conspiracy.
Appellate Information
Submitted: September 25, 2009
Filed: December 1, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Shepherd
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: