Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Wise, No. 09-1141

By FindLaw Staff on December 01, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's conspiracy to manufacture marijuana conviction is affirmed where: 1) there was no two-part interrogation for Miranda purposes because, prior to the recitation of the Miranda warnings, the officers made no deliberate or calculated effort to elicit a confession from defendant, and defendant made no incriminating statements; 2) following a "knock and talk," defendant told the detectives that he would prefer to talk inside his apartment, and he voluntarily consented to the detectives' entrance into the apartment; and 3) there was sufficient evidence to convict defendant of the conspiracy.

Read US v. Wise, No. 09-1141

Appellate Information

Submitted: September 25, 2009

Filed: December 1, 2009


Opinion by Judge Shepherd

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard