Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Van Wyhe v. Reisch, No. 08-1409

By FindLaw Staff on September 10, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a prisoners' action against South Dakota prison officials claiming violations of their free exercise of religion under the First Amendment and Section 3 of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), denial of summary judgment for defendants is affirmed in part, reversed in part and dismissed in part where: 1) denial of summary judgment on the plaintiffs' official capacity RLUIPA claims for monetary was improper as RLUIPA is constitutional and prison officials are entitled to the protection of sovereign immunity from monetary damages; 2) denial of summary judgment on plaitniff's injunctive relief claims for a tape player and extra group study time under RLUIPA and the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause was error; and 3) the court of appeals lacked jurisdiction to consider plaintiff's claim for a succah and his retaliation claims due to the existence of genuine disputes of material fact. 

Read Van Wyhe v. Reisch, No. 08-1409

Appellate Information

Submitted: November 13, 2009

Filed: September 10, 2009


Opinion by Hansen, Circuit Judge

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard