Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Zanders v. Swanson, No. 08-3221

By FindLaw Staff on July 20, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's dismissal of plaintiffs' preenforcement challenge to a state criminal statute for lack of standing is affirmed where: 1) plaintiffs failed to meet their Article III burden of proving that their First Amendment rights were chilled based on a subjective and sincere belief that under the statute they would be criminally charged for making truthful claims of police misconduct; and 2) the court did not abuse its  discretion in dismissing the claim of the one plaintiff with standing based on the Younger doctrine.    

Read Zanders v. Swanson, No. 08-3221

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Submitted: June 10, 2009
Filed: July 20, 2009

Before COLLOTON, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by BEAM, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard