Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Diaz v. Jaguar Restaurant Group, LLC, No. 09-16046

By FindLaw Staff on December 13, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

FLSA Action for Unpaid Overtime

In Diaz v. Jaguar Restaurant Group, LLC, No. 09-16046, an action against plaintiff's former employer for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the court reversed the district court's holding that plaintiff was an exempt administrative employee under the FLSA, where the administrative exemption issue was not tried by implied consent as plaintiff's testimony was relevant to another defense in this case: defendant's independent contractor defense.

  • As the court wrote:  "Isabel Diaz ("Diaz") filed a lawsuit against Jaguar Restaurant Group, LLC, Jagmar Management Group, LLC, Jagmar Brands, LLC, and Eduardo Durazo (collectively, "Jaguar"), her former employer, for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-216. During trial, the district court allowed Jaguar to amend its Answer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(b) to include the administrative exemption as an affirmative defense as it found that Diaz had injected the issue through her testimony at trial."

    Related Resources

    You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

    Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

    Or contact an attorney near you:
    Copied to clipboard