Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Harris v. United Auto. Ins. Grp., Inc., No. 08-16097

By FindLaw Staff on August 20, 2009 4:22 PM

In an action seeking to reinstate plaintiff's health insurance benefits, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where 26 C.F.R. section 54.4980B-8, A-5 did not apply to the employer-provided insurance plan in which plaintiff was participating, and thus his late payment of his insurance premium could not be excused under that regulation.

Read Harris v. United Auto. Ins. Grp., Inc., No. 08-16097

Appellate Information

Filed August 18, 2009

Judges

Per Curiam

Copied to clipboard