Harris v. United Auto. Ins. Grp., Inc., No. 08-16097
In an action seeking to reinstate plaintiff's health insurance benefits, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where 26 C.F.R. section 54.4980B-8, A-5 did not apply to the employer-provided insurance plan in which plaintiff was participating, and thus his late payment of his insurance premium could not be excused under that regulation.
Read Harris v. United Auto. Ins. Grp., Inc., No. 08-16097
Appellate Information
Filed August 18, 2009
Judges
Per Curiam