Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Mega Life & Health Ins. Co. v. Pieniozek, No. 08-14414

By FindLaw Staff on October 20, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action seeking rescission of defendant's life insurance policy, judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly determined that no timely jury demand was filed and served by either party with respect to the only issue before it on remand; and 2) the district court did not err in concluding the term "annual income" in the policy was ambiguous.

Read Mega Life & Health Ins. Co. v. Pieniozek, No. 08-14414

Appellate Information

Filed October 19, 2009


Opinion by Judge Dowd

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard