Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an action seeking rescission of defendant's life insurance policy, judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly determined that no timely jury demand was filed and served by either party with respect to the only issue before it on remand; and 2) the district court did not err in concluding the term "annual income" in the policy was ambiguous.
Filed October 19, 2009
Opinion by Judge Dowd
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.