Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an appeal from the grant of defendant's motion to compel arbitration in a class action against Sprint Nextel Corp. for allegedly charging improper roaming fees for calls placed within Sprint's coverage areas, the court of appeals certifies the following questions to the Florida Supreme Court: 1) must Florida courts evaluate both procedural and substantive unconscionability simultaneously in a balancing or sliding scale approach, or may courts consider either procedural or substantive unconscionability independently and conclude their analysis if either one is lacking?; 2) is the class action waiver provision in plaintiff's contract with Sprint procedurally unconscionable under Florida law? 3) is the class action waiver provision in plaintiff's contract with Sprint substantively unconscionable under Florida law?; and 4) is the class action waiver provision in plaintiff's contract with Sprint void under Florida law for any other reason?
Filed January 4, 2010
Opinion by Judge Hull
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: