Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an action alleging that Defendant misused Plaintiff's Internet domain names and website to promote his solo medical practice, judgment for Plaintiff is affirmed in part, where a reasonable jury could find that Defendant made misrepresentations in a copyright registration application; but reversed in part, where the District Court erred in determining that Plaintiff could not recover damages under both the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and the Lanham Act.
Filed July 9, 2009
Opinion by Judge Hull
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.