Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Bernal-Benitez, No. 08-10308

By FindLaw Staff on January 25, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendants' drug conspiracy convictions and sentences are affirmed where: 1) the magistrate judge's factual finding that a venireperson was less educated than the others in the venire, and subject to a peremptory strike on that ground, was not clearly erroneous; 2) the prosecutor's closing argument did not bolster the government witnesses' testimony; 3) one defendant's refusal to sign a waiver of rights form was not enough to constitute an invocation of his Miranda rights; and 4) the district court properly compared two defendants' roles with the conduct attributed to them in denying them a minor role adjustment.

Read US v. Bernal-Benitez, No. 08-10308

Appellate Information

Filed January 25, 2010


Opinion by Judge Tjoflat

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard