Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's child pornography conviction is affirmed, where defendant's convictions for both "receiving" and "possessing" child pornography did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause because the indictment charged and the government proved at trial that defendant had committed two distinct offenses, occurring on two different dates, in violation of two different statutes.
Appellate Information
Filed August 6, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Tjoflat
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: