Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Bonilla, No. 08-12127

By FindLaw Staff on August 20, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's identity theft conviction is affirmed in part where the record supported a finding that defendant's plea was knowing and voluntary, but vacated in part where the wire fraud counts of the indictment were multiplicitous and violative of the Double Jeopardy clause.

Read US v. Bonilla, No. 08-12127

Appellate Information

Filed August 18, 2009


Opinion by Judge Fay

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard