Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Gomez, No. 09-11031

By FindLaw Staff on August 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's identity theft conviction is vacated, where the District Court erred by failing to instruct the jury that the word "knowingly" in 18 U.S.C. section 1028A(a)(1) requires proof that he knew the means of identification belonged to an actual person.

Read US v. Gomez, No. 09-11031

Appellate Information

Filed August 28, 2009


Opinion by Judge Marcus

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard