Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's wire fraud conviction and sentence are affirmed where: 1) the district court did not improperly limit defendant's cross-examination, because the questioning defendant was permitted to do exposed facts that were more than sufficient to allow the jury to draw inferences about the prosecution witnesses' reliability; and 2) there was sufficient evidence to show that defendant actively participated in the scheme to defraud and had the requisite criminal intent.
Filed August 19, 2009
Opinion by Judge Marcus
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: