Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Maxwell, No. 07-11301

By FindLaw Staff on August 20, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's wire fraud conviction and sentence are affirmed where: 1) the district court did not improperly limit defendant's cross-examination, because the questioning defendant was permitted to do exposed facts that were more than sufficient to allow the jury to draw inferences about the prosecution witnesses' reliability; and 2) there was sufficient evidence to show that defendant actively participated in the scheme to defraud and had the requisite criminal intent.

Read US v. Maxwell, No. 07-11301

Appellate Information

Filed August 19, 2009


Opinion by Judge Marcus

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard