US v. Maxwell, No. 07-11301
Defendant's wire fraud conviction and sentence are affirmed where: 1) the district court did not improperly limit defendant's cross-examination, because the questioning defendant was permitted to do exposed facts that were more than sufficient to allow the jury to draw inferences about the prosecution witnesses' reliability; and 2) there was sufficient evidence to show that defendant actively participated in the scheme to defraud and had the requisite criminal intent.
Read US v. Maxwell, No. 07-11301
Filed August 19, 2009
Opinion by Judge Marcus
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.