Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Am. Contractors Indem. Co. v. US, No. 08-5188

By FindLaw Staff on June 29, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a breach of contract action brought pursuant to the Tucker Act, Court of Federal Claims judgment is reversed and remanded where the court erred in dismissing plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim, as the effective date of a surety bond is not necessarily the date of agreement or acquiescence within the meaning of 13 C.F.R. sec. 115.19(e). 

Read Am. Contractors Indem. Co. v. US, No. 08-5188

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims.
Decided June 29, 2009

Before NEWMAN, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by DYK, Circuit Judge.

For Plaintiff: Jefferson B. Slagle, Thompson, Slagle & Hannan, LLC, Duluth, Georgia.
For Defendant: Sean M. Dunn, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard