Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Andreu v. Sec'y. of Health & Human Servs., No. 2008-5184

By FindLaw Staff on June 18, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, the denial of the petition is reversed where the special master erroneously: 1) determined that the testimony of Petitioner's physicians was insufficient to establish "a logical sequence of cause and effect" leading to Petitioner's vaccine-related injury; and 2) imposed upon Petitioner an elevated evidentiary burden, requiring conclusive proof in the medical literature linking Petitioner's symptoms to the vaccine at issue.

Read the full decision in Andreu v. Sec'y. of Health & Human Servs., No. 2008-5184.

Appellate Information:

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case 98-VV-817, Senior Judge James F. Merow.

DECIDED on June 18, 2009


Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Opinoin by MAYER, Circuit Judge.


Clifford J. Shoemaker, Shoemaker and Associates, of Vienna, Virginia, argued for petitioners-appellants.

Darryl R. Wishard, Trial Attorney, Torts Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. With him on the brief were Timothy P. Garren, Director, Vincent J. Matanoski, Acting Deputy Director, and Catharine E. Reeves, Assistant Director.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard