Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Arlington Indus., Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., 10-1025

By FindLaw Staff on January 21, 2011 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
Action for infringement of patents related to improved electrical connector

Arlington Indus., Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., 10-1025, concerned an action for infringement of patents related to an improved electrical connector that snaps into electrical junction boxes with one hand instead of two.  In vacating the district court's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement, non-willfulness, and no damages as to the patents-in-suit, the court remanded the case in concluding that the district court in parties' second case misconstrued the "spring metal adapter" and "spring steel adapter" terms by importing a "split" limitation from the specifications into the claims.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard