Armstrong v. Dep't of the Treasury, No. 09-3155
In an action arising from claimant's removal for unlawfully accessing computer databases while serving as a criminal investigator for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) denying claimant's petition for review of an AJ's decision dismissing his case under a settlement agreement with the TIGTA is vacated in part, affirmed in part and remanded where: 1) MSPB's denial of petition for review is vacated and remanded because the Board improperly conflated the issue of timeliness with the ultimate decision on the merits of petitioner's claim; and 2) MSPB's decision with respect to its compliance decision is affirmed as it correctly concluded that petitioner abandoned any appeal from the AJ's separate decision that his employing agency, the TIGTA, had not breached the settlement agreement.
Read Armstrong v. Dep't of the Treasury, No. 09-3155
Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board
Decided January 4, 2010
Before: Michel, Chief Judge, and Plager and Linn, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Michel, Chief Judge
For Appellant: Kevin E. Byrnes, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP
For Appellee: Christopher A. Bowen, US Department of Justice, Commercial Litigation Branch
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.