Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Barela v. Shinseki, No. 09-7002

By FindLaw Staff on November 03, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

A decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims', denying a surviving spouse's claim for dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) from the Department of Veterans' Affairs, is affirmed as the government's interpretation of 38 U.S.C. section 1311(a)(2) is correct as it does not provide a stand-alone or independent basis for entitlement to DIC benefits. 

Read Barela v. Shinseki, No. 09-7002

Appellate Information

Appeal from:  United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided November 3, 2009


Before Michel, Chief Judge, Newman and Prost, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Prost


For Appellant:  Kenneth M. Carpenter

For Appellee:  Meredyth Cohen Havasy, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard