Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., No. 08-1282

By FindLaw Staff on August 05, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a patent infringement action involving oral contraceptives, district court judgment is affirmed where plaintiff's patent is invalid due to obviousness as it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in pharmaceutical formulation to try a normal pill in formulating drospirenone as an oral contraceptive. 

Read Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., No. 08-1282

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Decided August 5, 2009

Before NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Dissenting opinion by Circuit Judge NEWMAN

For Plaintiff: Peter B. Bensinger, Jr., Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, Illinois.

For Defendant: George C. Lombardi, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, Illinois.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard