Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Cold War Museum, Inc. v. Cold War Air Museum, Inc., No. 09-1172

By FindLaw Staff on November 05, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In trademark cancellation proceedings, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's (Board) decision canceling registration of appellant-Cold War Museum's service mark THE COLD WAR MUSEUM, finding that it had not proven acquired distinctiveness of the mark, is reversed where: 1) the Board erred in deciding that it could not consider evidence of acquired distinctiveness because appellant did not resubmit the evidence in the cancellation, as the unambiguous language of 37 C.F.R. section 2.122(b) provides that the entire file of the registration at issue is automatically part of the record, without any action necessary by the parties; and 2) the Board erred as a matter of law in concluding that appellee had established a prima facie case that the mark had not acquired distinctiveness as appellee failed to present any evidence whatsoever relating to the distinctiveness of the mark and failed even to argue that the mark had not acquired distinctiveness in its petition for cancellation. 

Read Cold War Museum, Inc. v. Cold War Air Museum, Inc., No. 09-1172

Appellate Information

Appeal from:  United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Decided November 5, 2009


Before:  Lourie, Linn, and Moore, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Moore


For Appellant:  A. Neal Seth, Mark H. Tidman, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC

For Appellee:  W. Thomas Timmons, Dallas, Texas

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard