Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int'l, Inc., No. 08-1306

By FindLaw Staff on September 10, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a patent case involving a hemodialysis machine integrated with a touch screen user interface, district court's ruling that plaintiffs infringed claims of three patents asserted by defendants is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated in part and remanded where: 1) plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the structures corresponding to certain means-plus-function claim limitations were present in the prior art, and thus they failed to prove that certain patent claims were invalid; 2) judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) as to all other asserted claims required reversal; 3) although the district court did not abuse its discretion when it permanently enjoined plaintiffs, the injunction is nevertheless vacated for reconsideration in light of the prior rulings; and 4) the royalty award is also vacated for reconsideration. 

Read Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int'l, Inc., No. 08-1306

Appellate Information

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Decided September 10, 2009


Before Newman, Gajarsa, and Dyk, CIrcuit Judges. 
Opinion by Gajarsa, Circuit Judge.   


For Appellant: Juanita R. Brooks, Fish & Richardson PC, Michael E. Florey, Mathias W. Samuel, Deanna J. Reichel, and Robert E. Hillman 

For Appellee: William F. Lee, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Bharat R. Ramamurti, William G. McElwain, Jonathon G. Cedarbaum, Michael J. Abernathy, and Sanjay K. Murthy

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard