Garber v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, No. 09-1047
In a patent infringement action, district court order denying plaintiff's motion for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) is reversed where the joint stipulation between the parties was filed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) and therefore divested the court of jurisdiction to enter any subsequent orders.
Read Garber v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, No. 09-1047
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Decided June 26, 2009
Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by LOURIE, Circuit Judge..
For Appellant: Andrew Staes, Staes & Scallan P.C., Chicago, Illinois.
For Appellee: Jerrold E. Salzman, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Chicago, Illinois
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.