Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Garber v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, No. 09-1047

By FindLaw Staff on June 26, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a patent infringement action, district court order denying plaintiff's motion for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) is reversed where the joint stipulation between the parties was filed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) and therefore divested the court of jurisdiction to enter any subsequent orders. 

Read Garber v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, No. 09-1047

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Decided June 26, 2009

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by LOURIE, Circuit Judge..

For Appellant: Andrew Staes, Staes & Scallan P.C., Chicago, Illinois.

For Appellee: Jerrold E. Salzman, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Chicago, Illinois

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard