Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Hyatt v. Kappos, 07-1066

By FindLaw Staff on November 08, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Section 145 imposes no limitation on patent applicant's right to introduce new evidence before the district court

Hyatt v. Kappos, 07-1066, concerned a plaintiff's civil action against the Director of the Patent Office pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 145, related to a patent application for a computerized display system for processing image information.

In vacating the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Director and remanding, the court held that 35 U.S.C. section 145 imposes no limitation on an applicant's right to introduce new evidence before the district court, apart from the evidentiary limitations applicable to all civil actions contained in the Federal Rules of Evidence and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and as such, the district court abused its discretion when it excluded petitioner's declaration under the wrong legal standard.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard